09
Dec

Sports Betting: Billy Walters

Author : Betting on Profit


Las Vegas sports betting legend Bill Walters has never had a losing year – a winning a streak that’s made odds makers call him the “most dangerous sports bettor in Nevada.” Lara Logan reports.

Tags: , , ,

25 Responses to “Sports Betting: Billy Walters”

  1. sasa2465 Says:

    Shocked! ! Incredible secrets of sports betting websites: gaa.nn.cx

  2. sasa2465 Says:

    Shocked! ! The most incredible secrets of sports betting websites: gaa.nn.cx

  3. findingan Says:

    The only way you can win in the long run is to either Back above true odds or Lay below true odds.

  4. itssimpleiwinyoulose Says:

    Billy is a donk. I owned him for $600k

  5. darwin20121 Says:

    @TheRyan41707 sure…I bet there is 10 million reasons why he would throw the game lol.

  6. sasa2465 Says:

    Shocked! ! The most incredible secrets of sports betting websites: gaa.nn.cx

  7. TheRyan41707 Says:

    @blo6k 1980 he was in a betting syndicate called the “computer group” they were legendary and cleaned up back in the day..not just sports wagering but all casino gambling.

  8. TheRyan41707 Says:

    @scrabbleking1965 Books can lose big. Go read about ” BLACK SUNDAY” worst day in vegas sportsbook history. Bookmaking is a skill like betting.

  9. TheRyan41707 Says:

    @raymejr Information is key…Injuries, weather, motivation, etc. Knowing about a key injury before the oddsmakers do and move the line.

  10. TheRyan41707 Says:

    @darwin20121 online sportsbook let you transfer money since the United States Goverment made it really hard to fund any offshore sportsbook. Different books have different methods…But having book to book transfers it keeps people playing and less annoyed.

  11. TheRyan41707 Says:

    @darwin20121 Football players making 10 Million a year have no reason to throw a game lol.

  12. ibehustlin Says:

    @blo6k need money to make money, he would of gotten started somehow….

  13. blo6k Says:

    if u have analysts that examine every game thats good , but how to start winning without having a capital ???

  14. darwin20121 Says:

    @itssimpleiwinyoulose sure…why don’t we just agree to disagree…peace out

  15. itssimpleiwinyoulose Says:

    @darwin20121 i dont know what you mean by “fake”, but the house wins because of the overound (around 105% or higher) so what your saying makes no sense

  16. darwin20121 Says:

    @Puls4rt of course the house is not responsible for the fix but they do get a cut. There is an enormous pie out there and everyone who is in on it gets a piece.

  17. darwin20121 Says:

    @Puls4rt Why would online gambling sites allow you to transfer money to their competitors it’s not like they are a bank. You have to see the bigger picture, think of the sports world as a conglomerate an entity or a monopoly who only make it seem that their all competing against each other, but in actual truth they are all investors with shares.

  18. darwin20121 Says:

    @Puls4rt I’ve been sportsbetting for 22 years and it’s only last couple of years that I’ve known the fix is in. Everything is connected from the ground up (media, casinos, players, sportscasters, coaches, colleges, university’s). The reason why people do not notice this is because they attach too much emotion to the games, start gambling without the emotions and you can see why the fix is in.

  19. ibehustlin Says:

    if u claim sports are fixed u just mad u losing

  20. Puls4rt Says:

    @darwin20121 i do sportsbetting for some years… I agree that some games may be fixed, but its not the house that is responsible for that. (im talking about public sport events(not matches arranjed by a casino, i have never seen that here, but in USA i dont know). If the game is fixed, the house is not responsible for that. Usually, its a big danger for the house if the match is fixed. They normally lose in that matches because of the unusual bets on one side or another.

  21. darwin20121 Says:

    @Puls4rt Yes, but the house also wins by fixing the games. If you don’t believe me take a few business classes, become really greedy and maybe you’ll understand how sports is conducted in the big leagues. Your probably not thinking greedy enough.

  22. Puls4rt Says:

    @darwin20121 imagine a 2 selection outcome , team A win, or Team B win. if team A has odd of 2.00 and team B 2.00, this makes a 100% book(50% + 50%). If you stake 100€ in both teams you don’t win or lose nothing. What the house does is offer you 1.85 for team A and 1.85 for team B( 54%+54%=108%). Means if you bet 100€ in both teams your loss is 15€ guaranteed. Thats how the house wins.

  23. darwin20121 Says:

    @Puls4rt think again. If i bet $110 on a game i win $100 therefore the house gets nothing not %10. When 100 people are betting on a game at the mark of +-110% and say it’s 50/50 for either team, that means the house only gets $500 of the take. But it is never always 50/50, next time lets say it’s 40/60 and the house loses that means the house loses a whopping $1600. Media is also in on this and try to persuade the customer to a certain team. Business point of view is to maximize profits.

  24. Puls4rt Says:

    @darwin20121 you are very wrong. house wins because they discount some % on the odds. if you sum all the odds of a selection (win only) it gives you +- 110%. 10% to the house

  25. romeojew Says:

    For the past few months I have been following this Guy on Twitter- betfairplayer2, He can predicted price moves like I’ve never seen before, He also gives lay bets which are accompanied by full write ups which he puts up on his blog, His write ups are not the normal rubbish, Well worth checking him out, In running players would love him

Leave a Reply