13
Feb

9/11: The Tip of the Iceberg (Part 2 of 2)

Author : Betting on Profit


Hijackers Passport found at WTC, No Black Boxes (Source: Official 9/11 Commission Report) 1) “Suqami’s passport survived the attack: a passerby picked it up from the World Trade Center and handed to a New York Police Department detective shortly before the towers collapsed.” Quote Source: govinfo.library.unt.edu 2) US Courts Evidence: United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui, Criminal No. 01-455-A “Exhibit Number: WT00001; Description: Saudi Arabian passport in the name of SATAM MA AL SUQAMI” – www.vaed.uscourts.gov 3) Satam Suqami (Mainstream coverage): a) abcnews.go.com b) archives.cnn.com Cheney’s Stand down initiative: a) www.dtic.mil b) www.dtic.mil c) Proof of Cheney Stand down on 9/11 from US Commission Hearing @ www.journalof911studies.com Insider Trading (“Buzzy” Krongard) CIA 1. September 6, 2001 – Large number of “put” options are placed on United Airlines stock betting that the stock price would fall. a) www.sfgate.com b) tinyurl.com (Chicago Tribune) 2. September 6, 2001 – Some of the put options placed on United Airlines stock were purchased through the investment banking firm of Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown in which the current Executive Director of the CIA, AB “Buzzy” Krongard, used to be the company’s CEO up until 1998. web.archive.org (CIA.gov took this down in 2005, Why?) 3. January 9, 2005 – Let bin Laden stay free, says ex-No. 3 CIA man AB “Buzzy” Krongard. www.timesonline.co.uk 4. All the proof you need. (Insider Trading) tvnewslies.org Ex. CIA-director

Tags: , ,

24 Responses to “9/11: The Tip of the Iceberg (Part 2 of 2)”

  1. mvanherd Says:

    /watch?v=-ftC7vTXkJU&feature=related
    Bush and Blair guilty of war crimes.

  2. MrSavagerocks Says:

    @Sept11Discovery No crazy ass truthtards are going to do anything but sit at home and whine on the net. Because they need personal attention,and thouroughly enjoy lying on the victims of 911. Check the link on my page,for undeniable proof the truthtatds are lying.

  3. Sept11Discovery Says:

    We have done enough talking baout 911…lets do something!

    SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH DISCOVERY PROJECT!

  4. HardcoreJungFunk Says:

    @danokkkrock 2 were recovered apparently FL93 and 77(but no black boxes from WTC) but there are no serial numbers assigned to the boxes (according to NTSB) so we cant verify what planes they were from. FOIA requests denied. As the FBI “assisted” the NTSB with the aircraft parts ID. Its probable that the FAA no longer possess the 9/11 aircraft recs containing serial nos of component data and the FBI seized these as they were the lead investigative body of 9/11

  5. MrSwift05 Says:

    Bush will burn in hell for this he thinks he got away with all this…HE HAS NOT!!!

  6. bmw200000 Says:

    9/11 was an inside job. Plane and Simple.

  7. chris03653837 Says:

    @Sept11Discovery BECAUSE THIS FAMILY HAS A PACK WITH THE DEVIL!!!!!

  8. Sept11Discovery Says:

    It is hiliarious…When JFK gets killed, Bush is phoning in tips, when Regan gets shot, Bush was going to have dinner with a Hinckley family member, when 911 happens Bush is meeting with Osma Bin Laden’s Family….I have one question.

    Why isn’t George Bush hanging from a noose?

  9. megamogx Says:

    v=yuC_4mGTs98

    v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

    v=5qFsjdymqSk

    v=OQgVCj7q49o

    v=KhdppHwUJ9k

    v=zhnNy5EsebA

    v=iGqjzFQvfdI

    v=WxqoChniKVU

    v=9QWvkAgyIY4

    v=qFpbZ-aLDLY

    v=HfmliaqIRBE

    v=HSjDCwN2i3w

    v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

    v=wKuLUu7SQU4

    v=dVutUGDiQN0

    v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4

    v=4CfNSDnz8qI

    v=hVaGht6eHoQ

    v=9fNLz8zWwaM

    v=Ne1FJBVkh4s

    v=2rYR3JLaNp0

    v=9nc5_5IJek8

    v=mVMrhqb4WwE

    v=7e_ImZYzNLs

    v=JeU1rxnj0o4

    v=LG6i6WBHM3U

    v=q4dU_p9UTTs

    v=b813ITCwU70

    v=8En6Ag8y77M

    v=zQXwVs7fV1c

    v=s9C7V_4iEyE

    v=kG4yGICFsi8

    v=5c1WERse4uI

  10. megamogx Says:

    CNN and BBC knew WTC7 would collapse in advance and the pentagon could never have been hit by a plane an hour after an attack unless openings were made.
    What more proof do people need to look into 9/11 and do their own research.

  11. cljerjr31 Says:

    i never connected the older bush (SR.) to this.

  12. starmanskye Says:

    WoW — That’s the 1st time I’ve heard Maj MacDonald’s technical analysis re: the underslung ‘pod’ being a Martin Marietta military flight-controller. I wouldn’t have thought such an external device was necessary since cockpit flight-control computer could be programmed or modified w/ remote capability — As German ex-Minister claimed the Boeing fleet of Lufthansa was delivered w/ but promptly removed. Most damning evidence of inside conspiracy is coordinated deep-state cover-up & falsification.

  13. OneClownShoe Says:

    I have watched many of the 9/11 videos and researched all I can find about it. I must say that this is, by far, the video that makes the most sense. I don’t trust ultra rich people and I certainly don’t trust the U.S. government. If you look at it from an “Occam’s razor” point of view, this report totally fits. It’s the ultimate cover up for personal (as well as business) gain. The best point is the motive for this crime. It makes me as angry today as it did the day it happened.

  14. wellifthemediasaysit Says:

    TO DATE theres isnt 1 PIC OR VID that even shows a commercial airliner used on 9/11! its ASTONISHING!! missing plane at pentagon and the 4th that ‘melted in a field (shot down), the only footage of the 1st plane hitting wtc is a blur, there are NUMEROUS SHOTS of the 2nd plane hit wtc, but not one shows the colours/tail of an AA or UA jet, they have all been altered, if you watch closely you can make out a blue/white tail! THAT IS NOT A PASSENGER JET!! Watch ‘september clues’ on YT! 9/11’s a lie

  15. Shamagogue Says:

    @Thetan1974 Dear M’Ron…..READ ONCE MORE — – “its very easy to SOLVE (PROVE)..all that is required is for the FBI to release all the surveillance videos it “Confiscated” from the Pentagon and surrounding businesses soon after 911 occured!

  16. Thetan1974 Says:

    @Shamagogue
    About Fl 93, there are numerous signs and even eye witnesses to that it was shot down and the debris field indicates that also. Bush even ordered it shot down. So to me the most plausible explanation is that 93 was indeed truly hijacked and therefor also the only one that had to be shot down. Then they spinned the lie that the hijackers were fought by the “brave pasengers” just to generate stuff for a Hollywood brainwashing to cast more sheeple into war against the “sand niggers.”

  17. Thetan1974 Says:

    @Shamagogue
    There is none. But there are eyewitnesses – which in this case can state that the official flight path is a lie: watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

    Yet I don’t agree with the conclusions that the plane went over – there’s ONE and un-reliable witness for that account.

    And there were Boeing parts found at the site. But as I said I agree that there’s NO proof that they are from AA Flight 77.

    But to state that “no plane hit the Pentagon” will always be considered nuts by the sleeping masses.

  18. Shamagogue Says:

    @Thetan1974 – So just where on youtube or any other site is there a video of an unenhanced and clearly identifiable passenger airliner “crashing” into the Pentagon??? Also where is there any videos or any physical passenger airliner (or human DNA) “Evidence” that prove Flt.93 crashed in Penn??? Without this solid Evidence all thats being spun are deceptions and half truths foisted upon the public for (US Govt) disinformation and propaganda purposes!

  19. Thetan1974 Says:

    @Shamagogue
    “So its easy put the 911 Truthers to Shame.. just Release those Videos!”

    Actually, a lot have been released over the years from FOIA requests from this Scott Bingham. A lot of them are on YouTube. But if you follow his story here at penttbom. com, it is remarkable that he never showed the last 5-7 videos he got from the FBI and that those were copied over by filming a TV set playing the videos!

    Something’s terrible wrong, and I’m wondering why Bingham hastes to his conclusions.

  20. Thetan1974 Says:

    @Shamagogue
    I repeat: There’s evidence of some sort of Boeing(?)/plane being desintegradet into Oblivion though leaving a few parts behind. But those parts have never been forensically matched to AA Flight 77.

    There has been found DNA from all passengers and most of the hijackers who were on the flight (or so they say) except from a 2-year-old kid and – tadaa! – Hani Hanjour!

  21. Shamagogue Says:

    @Thetan1974 – as far as Flt.93 goes theres No videos of its crash and No physical crash Evidence,neither identifyable “passenger jetliner” debris nor human tissue or DNA debris nor any “Black Boxes”! As far as what the Pentagon got hit by…its very easy to solve..all that is required is for the FBI to release all the surveillance videos it “Confiscated” from the Pentagon and surrounding businesses soon after 911 occured! So its easy put the 911 Truthers to Shame.. just Release those Videos!

  22. shadowmom Says:

    Google 9/11 FACTS. Not theories, not tin hat stuff. Facts – documented facts. Building 7 came down in the afternoon of 9/11, in its own footstep….with no plane impact whatsoever. Think. Just think. Operation Northwoods was not fantasy. Look that up, as well.

  23. Thetan1974 Says:

    @Shamagogue
    I’m not sure of what you mean here: There’s all kinds of proof that Fl. 93 was shot down: Witnesses (whom noone will believe/listen to – except from 9/11 Truthers, of course) the fighters seen in the area, the debris field…

    There’s absolutely no proof that the passengers managed to maintain the hijackers and thereby cause the plane to crash.

    There is some physical evidence that a Boeing (757…?) struck the Pentagon – but none that it was Fl. 77. Nor that H. Hanjour piloted it.

  24. Shamagogue Says:

    @atrios28 – This video is repeating the “Lie” that Flt.93 was Shot Down as a Documented Truth…when there is still NO Physical Evidence Whatsoever to Prove that…neither is there any Proof that a Commercial Airliner struck the Pentagon! Repeating these “Lies” as if they were actual “Facts” makes the video presentation “Suspect” and its real Purpose seems more like someone sowing “Disinformation” and Biased Govt.Propaganda!

Leave a Reply